India Plans Special NCLT Bench for Cross-Border Insolvency Cases to Speed Up Resolutions

India plans to set up a special bench of the National Company Law Tribunal with trained manpower to handle cross-border insolvency cases once the new bankruptcy rules are notified, to fast-track proceedings.
India Plans Special NCLT Bench for Cross-Border Insolvency Cases to Speed Up Resolutions

New Delhi, April 17: The cross-border framework, approved last month as part of amendments to the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC), will be based on a model UN law with modifications to suit the Indian context.

Need for the Framework

The need emerged during bankruptcy proceedings involving Amtek Auto, Videocon Industries, Essar Steel, and Jet Airways , where issues such as asset location and complex cross-border procedures delayed resolution.

Key Features

  • Enables easier access for creditors to overseas assets of stressed companies

  • Allows India to seek cooperation from foreign courts to bring such assets under insolvency proceedings

  • Every draft rule must be laid before each House of Parliament (parliamentary oversight)

Special NCLT Bench

  • Will have members trained in cross-border insolvency resolution

  • Necessary for time-bound insolvency proceedings

  • Prevents situation where foreign adjudicating authority moves fast while India lags

UN Model Framework

The United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL) model law for cross-border insolvency resolution has been adopted by more than 50 jurisdictions , based on principles of:

  • Access to foreign and domestic courts

  • Recognition of foreign proceedings

  • Cooperation between courts

  • Coordination of multiple concurrent insolvency proceedings

Expert View

Yogendra Aldak, executive partner at Lakshmikumaran & Sridharan attorneys, said: "A special bench will result in faster resolution of cross-border insolvency cases. This will brighten the chances of recovery for creditors as well."

Background

Earlier, the IBC provided for cross-border insolvency through bilateral agreements and letters of request under Section 234, but this mechanism was ad hoc and prone to delays and uncertainty.